text: reading: this shit is crazy. it's crazy.Renay ([personal profile] renay) wrote,
@ 2009-06-01 02:56 am UTC
  • Previous Entry
  • Add to Memories
  • Tell someone about this!
  • Next Entry
Entry tags:books, let's get literate! 2009

Graceling, Kristin Cashore: It's time for another exciting installment of Renay Finds Gay Subtext Unexpectedly And Becomes Obsessed. First, perhaps I should tell you about this book I read that I liked so much I read it twice less than a month apart. This never happens, unless you're John Green, and there's only one John Green that writes fabulous, thinky YA and I am fairly certain that Kristin Cashore is not John Green! In fact, if she is, then John Green has been keeping some secrets! Huge ones! Shaped like a uterus.

Katsa has one blue eye and one green eye. Wait! I know what you're thinking: special eyes? Renay, are you trying to get me to read questionable Mary Sue fanfic? On any other day, you might be right, because I am tricky like that, but this is not that day. Katsa's blue eye and green eye mark her as Graced—Graced with the power to kill anyone in any circumstances. Because of her special Grace, her uncle, King Randa of the Middluns, kept Katsa from a small child as his personal, one-woman brute squad, using Katsa's skills to bully other lords out of money, property or to punish them for trespasses small and large. Katsa's reputation throughout the Seven Kingdoms is well-known. As the story opens, she is beginning to resent Randa for his orders and herself for being kept like a dog, so much so she has created a secret Council unbeknownest to Randa—a council that does good works throughout the kingdoms. It's these works that lead Katsa to the mission that will change her life.

Being Graced in this world is being special but also being shunned—Katsa's Grace of killing is more extreme than others, like swimming, or being excellent with numbers or hand-to-hand combat, but even with the benefit of a skill, being Graced isn't something a parent wants at all. People live in fear of their child's eyes changing.

"The innkeeper's sister has a baby of three months," Oll said. "They had a scare the other morning. They thought one of its eyes had darkened, but it was only a trick of the light."


Graced children are often given up to the king's use, but in Katsa's case she was orphaned rather than given, and when her Grace revealed itself, it was a boon to Randa. As Graced royalty but also a girl, Katsa has not led a normal life. The most interesting part of this book for me wasn't the romance, or the sweet action scenes, but was Katsa noting things about her world that bothered her—how she is a girl left to live outside the social structure while chafing for those inside it. For instance, after Katsa sees an incident with a serving girl being attacked:

"Is it your sister I saw serving drinks in the eating room?" Katsa asked.
"Yes, My Lady."
"How old is she?"
"Sixteen, My Lady."
"And you?"
"I'm fourteen, and my sister eleven, My Lady."
Katsa watched the younger girl collecting hair with a broom taller than she was.
"Does anyone teach the girls of the inn to protect themselves?" she asked. "Do you carry a knife?"
"Our father protects us, and our brother," the girl said, simply.
.... And wondered if other girls in Sunder, and across the seven kingdoms, carried knives; or if they all looked to their fathers and brothers for every protection.


Also:

How absurd it was that in all seven kingdoms, the weakest and most vulnerable of people—girls, women—went unarmed and were taught nothing of fighting, while the strong were trained to the highest reaches of their skill.


I loved the feminist themes in this book. Katsa's examination of the social structure around her that she had the ability to analyze because she was shut out of it by being Graced was fascinating. Her Grace caused the rest of society to shun her—even as a child she was largely raised by men until late in childhood, long enough for her to be Othered enough to not fit back into it, even though Randa forces her into dresses that she hates and parades her in front of his court. He doesn't do it to welcome her into it, but to further separate her—look at the lady killer in her gowns, doesn't she look beautiful—except most people are likely not seeing her as anything but an enforcer. Katsa never wants to re-enter the system and rightly so.

However, the writing left me wanting more—the narrative was a little distant. The third-person was not as close as I'm used to and there wasn't as much emotional connection between me and the text (because it's all about me). I'm not sure how this could have been fixed, really. Also, if I read another reference to "the child" one more time I might explode. The flow of the story was thrown off for me whenever the author referred to a major character in that way. It made Katsa seem emotionally distant in times when she shouldn't have been, when the story was saying she wasn't. The story said, hey! Katsa is totally engaged. The writing said otherwise, internets! I swear.

The romance was lovely. It's quite obvious from the beginning where it's going, and the surprises that crop up throughout the courtship were sweet. Oh, how I love well-done foreshadowing! I am a fan of the romance, especially the way Katsa tricks the system in order to remain true to herself, gaining her freedom for real, and always able to keep it by choosing to forgo marriage—a social construct that in the seven kingdoms can create a trap for girls and women. I was full of hearts over Katsa's choice. I was so full of hearts, once I went and looked for what other people thought of it (otherwise known as looking for fanfic) all my hearts DEFLATED. How sad is that, deflated hearts.

Stop! Are you ready for my controversial and tl;dr opinion?

The reactions to the romance skeeve me out. I am concerned about how many people (women!) feel a need a) rush and defend marriage, quick, because it's under attack by this awful anti-marriage character! b) start flailing about over sex outside of wedlock (boy, that's a fun word!) or c) go on and on about how women should be making the sacrifices in order to make the relationship deeper and more meaningful. I have examined several of these reactions and the more I read the more grossed out I became by this feeling that many grown women and many more (!!!) young women believe that marriage is some mark of sexual maturity. I do not understand why readers are taking Katsa's decision out of the context of her world and placing it into ours in order to judge her and be disappointed by her choice. Welcome to WTFville, Population: Me. I don't normally go around telling readers they're read the book wrong or have missed the point, but in this case I'm rocking the boat. Observe:

Graceling is in a medieval fantasy setting. There are dowries in this book! Dowries, in a medieval setting! In case people do not understand what this is or how it's used in the story, it's the money a woman's family pays when she gets married to pad the pockets of the new household (i.e. the man's pockets). It can come in the form of actual cash in a suitcase, some sweet loot the husband can auction off, or that best of all penis-enhancing items: land. Because the more land a man has, the bigger he feels! The more he owns, the more important he is! I remember my Medieval Europe classes and discussion of dowries. Boy, do I. I also remember how many antacids I had to eat!

NOTE: IT WAS A LOT. I could have purchased stock in Tums.

The fact that the setting of this book is so and there are dowries suggests that women do not have much, if any, agency. They are traded like stock and I would like to point out that women do not resemble cows at the worst of times. In the context of the setting, it is silly to pretend that it isn't a big deal that women are bartered or traded or used as chips in oftentimes deadly games of Penis #1 versus Penis #2 with the prize being marriage. Oh boy! How romantic. I believe it is safe to say that Graceling is not operating on 21st century sensibilities and to pretend otherwise is, yes, you guessed it, missing the point.

Kats'a world is not our world. Katsa's world is called the seven kingdoms, not The United States of America. Her world is one where marriage is a certain path followed by women because they have limited options. Katsa is not ruled by the same standards as other women. She is Graced; she is Othered. Therefore, she has not been on that path, trained and dare I say it, brainwashed to believe that the only path is marrying a man, running that man's house, bearing his children. It is obvious; we can see it in her language and the language of women around her. Katsa does not shop at the Gap. She kills animals and breaks grown men with her bare hands. She has been cast out of the system! Entering into marriage as royalty, even with someone who understands her, would cause her to be at odds with that system. It would be like women's rights marches, expect with swords and arrows instead of picket signs. There would probably be blood and guts everywhere. You're saying: start a revolution, Katsa! Have marriage your way! This is not Burger King, this is a man's world and it is obvious it is a man's world. I have read about how marriage takes two individuals and turns them into one and how unselfish giving yourself to another person is and how dare Katsa be so selfish as to value herself as a person over herself merged with a man and how the mere act of marriage creates another, different person through love (but only properly married love). Please note how if a woman merges with a man she creates a new person as if there's something wrong with the person she was! Are you fucking kidding me!

I'm so impressed by the depth of thought here! I am not sure how more offensive it could get. It suggests that marriage is the only way this can happen and that it should happen or else a woman is selfish and cruel to the poor, poor men. It also erases couples who cannot or possibly do not want get married (Raffin! Bann! Me!). Does this mean I can never reach the same depth of emotion as a couple who have shoved cake in each other's faces in front of friends and family? For Katsa, there is no becoming one with a husband because in her world that is not possible because marriage can be and is used as a system of oppression. It surprises me how many women reading this book are in such a hurry for her to re-enter this system that shunned her, abused her, Othered her, made a child killer out of her for the mere concept of "marriage" when she would have more outside the system. It's not just about the man, internets! It can also be about the system that benefits the man over the woman, and the system that will not bend for the will of one Graced woman, the system that would attempt to mold her into her proper place, Graced or no. She would change in fundamental ways that have nothing to do with the man by accepting her place in that system that had treated her so badly. Attempting to judge her for her choices by removing the context of her choice is pretty terrible, actually! I feel a game of Let's Blame the Victim coming on. Should I go get my Sexism Bingo Card for that or should I just start repeatedly punching myself in the face? Either way, I'm going to be in pain.

In summary: ARRRRRRRRRGH.

Now that I have that out of my system, let's go back to the important part: boys kissing! Guys, Raffin and Bann are totally making out on work tables, and knocking over jars of herbs and medicines, and sleeping curled up together in Raffin's work room, sweaty and naked and probably very pleased with themselves for fooling everyone with their "friendship" that disguises a Big Gay Romance. I searched the author's site for proof, but she is tricky and smart, and doesn't answer questions about subtext. It's probably a good idea she made this policy, because she knew the slashers would be along eventually and would start e-mailing her about it in order to get fodder for awesome fanfiction. Speaking of awesome fanfiction, I am upset that none exists for Raffin and Bann and their awesome affair that is doomed because I have this strange feeling that boys making out is about as popular as women having their own power in the seven kingdoms. What hurts the most isn't that Bann doesn't have any speaking parts or that we only see their interactions through Katsa's lovestruck gaze, or that Po knows something but won't share it with Katsa because he values Raffin's privacy, and Bann's, but that I won't know for sure until the follow-up novel to Graceling comes out. Fire is a prequel and Bitterblue is in the process of being written and I'm going to have to suffer for at least another year before I know—possibly longer. Excuse me while I sob into my hands.

On the plus side, at least I can write lots of boys kissing in the meantime until I get jossed.

Other favorite quotes:

Randa hadn't spoken to her, hadn't even looked at her, had only said her name. He loved to brag of her, as if her great ability were his doing. As if she were the arrow, and he the archer whose skill drove her home. No, not an arrow—that didn't quite capture it. A dog. To Randa she was a savage dog he'd broken and trained. He set her on her enemies and allowed her out of her cage to be groomed and kept pretty, to sit among his friends and make them nervous.


He laughed. "I know you're teasing me. And you should know I'm not easily humiliated. You may hunt for my food, and pound me every time we fight, and protect me when we're attacked, if you like. I'll thank you for it."
"But I'd never need to protect you, if we were attacked. And I doubt you need me to do your hunting, either."
"True. But you're better than I am, Katsa. And it doesn't humiliate me." He fed a branch to the fire. "It humbles me. But it doesn't humiliate me."


She would go to his bed at night .... and lie with a man who considered a scratch to her face an affront to his person. A man who thought himself her protector—her protector when she could out duel him if she used a toothpick to his sword.


Graceling: yet more Feminist YA, if a little shaky at times and unsure of itself, but very awesome. I honestly cannot wait to see how Cashore manages to live up to it with Fire.


(10 comments) - (Post a new comment)
(Flat) (Top-level comments only)

Aeris and Tifa from Final Fantasy VII, laughing.

[personal profile] shanaqui
2009-06-01 01:04 pm UTC (link)
I didn't find Katsa a particularly feminist figure. I guess some people find it empowering, but what I noticed when reading was that she's not a kickass woman in her own right, she's a kickass woman because she can do man-things. She can kick butt, she hates wearing dresses, she won't get married, she doesn't want children, she gets her hair cut short... Why can't she be a kickass woman while still wanting to have a child? Why does she have to do stereotypically male things, wear her hair short like a man, to be a strong female character? Part of this is formed by the world she's written into, of course, but then... you've got to remember that this world doesn't have to follow the same rules as, say, medieval Britain. It's not medieval Britain! Kristin Cashore could have written a whole new world with a kickass female character and not have it be so gendered.

And obviously part of this is my own kneejerk perception of anti-marriage, anti-children, dress-hating, butt kicking as being masculine. But that's not just me: that's a pretty common view, which Kristin Cashore should be as aware of as I am.

I appreciate your points about why the anti-marriage -- I didn't read very analytically, so I missed bits and didn't pick up on some of the things you mentioned. The anti-marriage felt quite "pastede on" to me, but it makes a bit more sense with what you mentioned. That'll teach me to read when I'm busy stressing about exams, I guess!

(Reply to this)  (Thread


Text: I love being awesome!

[personal profile] renay
2009-06-01 06:36 pm UTC (link)
She can do man-things? Really? So, are man things man things because only men should be able to do them, or man things because the default of our society is male? Women should only ever do them if they also like to wear dresses and want to squeeze out 10 kids? I am uncertain of your point. I also disagree that the feminist themes were pasted on, because they crop up so much in Katsa's thought and in the story proper.

Also, I disagree: this story has to follow the internal rules set by the canon, not by "I wish the author could have written a whole new world and gone by THOSE rules". I only compared it to medieval Europe, I didn't ask the story or the author to do something different to give me what I wanted. This is problematic!

I would also like to point out that I see this language being used often by many reviews and it bothers me because I think it is wrong. Katsa is not anti-marriage. She simply doesn't want these things for herself at this time, but is absolutely fine when other people indulge in them, exampled several times throughout the book. The author has left it open for her to eventually choose that path if she wants. I have no clue where the concept of "Katsa the marriage and kid hater" comes from, but I feel a lot of people are projecting.

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent)  (Thread


Yukari from Persona 3.

[personal profile] shanaqui
2009-06-01 08:57 pm UTC (link)
I'm not saying that certain actions should be gendered or that I think of them as gendered. My family is pretty non-traditional, my dad's a homemaker and my mother brings home the bacon, you know? But I'm also very aware of what "traditional" is supposed to be in an upper middle class British family. I went to a conservative private school, in which there were about three women in positions of authority at any one time, if that, and things were very gendered. There was the girls like pink and boys like blue stereotype, there was a stereotype that the boys fight and the girls bitch, and girls shouldn't play with boys because that's unladylike, etc. I was taught to read actions as gendered, and a part of me still does, although I don't think I ever really accepted it at all (re: I knew damn well my dad was no girl).

And then, of course, I got to university. I've been doing the first year of a philosophy degree. As part of the exam I've just done -- which I guess is why it was fresh in my mind while I was reading Graceling! -- we talked a lot about discrimination, gendering in society, gender/power... One of the theories about discrimination against women in the workplace, for example, was that it doesn't matter how much we compensate for women so they can work and bring up their children, as long as the perception is that bringing up children is "women's work", then gendering is a problem. Which is why the gendering of actions sticks in my head as a problem.

Bear in mind that in the next few paragraphs when I talk about masculinity and femininity I'm referring to what my upbringing says about them. I don't think if you cut your hair short, you're masculine, or that if you fight, you're masculine, etc.

That is what prompts my reaction to Katsa. Society tells me that certain actions are gendered. Katsa fights: that's gendered male. Katsa cuts her hair short: that's gendered male. Katsa wants her freedom: that's gendered male. Katsa gets involved in the political situation: that's gendered male. And I can't off-hand think of anything she does that's gendered female -- she doesn't like wearing dresses, she doesn't want a husband, she doesn't want children. To me, she doesn't come across as feminine at all -- which is fine, you know? If she was a real person, choosing those things for herself. But she's a character. And I'm tired of female characters who just become like the men of their society, to claim equality. Kristin Cashore chose to write her like this. I can see the interpretation that Katsa breaks free of gendering, and I'd honestly like to see it that way myself, but I don't. I can't ignore the fact, personally, that her actions are all gendered male according to my upbringing, and things that might gender her as female according to my upbringing (dresses, long hair, children) are removed.

That's why she doesn't feel like a feminist character to me. I am so sick of female characters who are written as completely unfeminine in the attempt to make them equal to the men. I'm sure that wasn't Kristin Cashore's intent and maybe you didn't see any of this, but that's what happened in my reading of it. I didn't intend to say that those actions are gendered, just that they are perceived as gendered, you know? I like to read about women who kick ass and take names and yet can still be feminine too. To me it feels just as sexist for a woman to become completely masculine (in the eyes of my upbringing) so she can possess agency, as for her to be utterly feminine and not possess any agency. I understand that Kristin Cashore's intent won't have been that, but that's the way it read to me.

To be honest, if I'd read Graceling more analytically, I probably wouldn't have been as annoyed by the anti-marriage elements. I didn't, though, and nor was my review all that analytical. Your review sheds light on that for me and I'm grateful. At the time, though, I was reading for a good story, and I didn't engage with the critical stuff.

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent


Communication is Decadent

[personal profile] lassarina
2009-06-01 02:48 pm UTC (link)
Okay so apparently I have to read this book now. THANKS NAY. Cause I don't have enough to do. XD

(Reply to this)  (Thread


Text: I love being awesome!

[personal profile] renay
2009-06-01 06:37 pm UTC (link)
I WIN! \o/

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent


Like pink but not quite
Graceling
[personal profile] crabapplered
2009-06-01 10:44 pm UTC (link)
:/ I dunno. On the one hand, there's a possibility of a female character I could like and a romance I might not want to throw shoes at. On the other, there's what sounds like a completely borked magic system. She can kill anyone at any time? Talk about cheap. Not to mention the inevitable cheese fest when someone out there thinks up "lol, she can't kill the person who is graced with the ability to be immune to everything!"

Just. Argh.

(Reply to this)  (Thread


Text: I love being awesome!
Re: Graceling
[personal profile] renay
2009-06-02 04:09 am UTC (link)
Is it magic? I actually can't decide whether it's a magic system. I didn't think about magic while reading it. I could tell you why I don't think it's cheap, but it would be a spoiler. ;)

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent



[identity profile] wildejoy.livejournal.com
2009-06-02 12:49 am UTC (link)
Hi! So. First of all: "Katsa has one blue eye and one green eye. Wait! I know what you're thinking: special eyes? Renay, are you trying to get me to read questionable Mary Sue fanfic? On any other day, you might be right, because I am tricky like that, but this is not that day." Renay, this? ...there's only one John Green that writes fabulous, thinky YA and I am fairly certain that Kristin Cashore is not John Green! In fact, if she is, then John Green has been keeping some secrets! Huge ones! Shaped like a uterus. And this? These are why I love you. XD

I agree with a lot of your points - particularly your long section on Katsa's supposed 'anti-marriage anti-kids' position. A frightening number of people insist that women are not proper women if they don't want kids - even those people who feel that they are totally feminist and all about equality.

Also, if I read another reference to "the child" one more time I might explode. The flow of the story was thrown off for me whenever the author referred to a major character in that way. It made Katsa seem emotionally distant in times when she shouldn't have been, when the story was saying she wasn't. The story said, hey! Katsa is totally engaged. The writing said otherwise, internets! You know, I didn't like how often she referred to Bitterblue as 'the child' either, but I couldn't really explain why. Now I know! This is also why I love your reviews; you always manage to say things that are half-formed ideas or shapeless feelings for me. (Did that sentence make sense? Um.) You're just incredibly insightful.

I really loved the Council that Katsa created, and the way that it grew and grew until it was actually almost its own little government. Katsa's fighting skills were never questioned, but throughout the book she has astoundingly low self-esteem, and I think the Council is a real testament to the fact that she is not just the brawn of this operation. Because being physically strong, as has been mentioned before, does not necessarily make your character strong. Katsa, I felt, was a strong character because not only could she whoop a guy's ass with her pinky fingernail, she could be sneaky and intelligent too.

IN SHORT! (or, you know, not-so-short.) Please don't ever stop reviewing books.

I sincerely hope I haven't put my foot in my mouth again. Because I have been doing that a lot lately. Just smack me upside the head if I have.

(Reply to this



(Anonymous)
2009-06-03 08:38 pm UTC (link)
Hey, I thought I was the only one who noticed the Raffin-Bann subtext. It was just subtle enough to make me wonder if I was going crazy, but certain lines seemed to rally back it up, especially when Raffin and Bann start laughing at Katsa when she asks him if he's in love with her too. It's nice to see someone else caught the inferences.

(Reply to this)  (Thread


Text: I love being awesome!

[personal profile] renay
2009-06-03 08:40 pm UTC (link)
They are so in love, I agree! There was a particular conversation Katsa and Po have toward the end of the book that might as well been a flashing light going "LOTS OF BOYS KISSING RIGHT HERE. LOTS OF KISSING."

I worry Bitterblue will kill all my hopes and dreams by having Raffin madly in love with someone. S-sob. >.>

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent



(10 comments) - (Post a new comment)
(Flat) (Top-level comments only)